Plant and equipment expenditures, 1984.
Seskin, Eugene P. ; Landefeld, J. Steven
Plant and Equipment Expenditures, 1984
NONFARM business in the United States plans to spend $333.3 billion
for new plant and equipment in 1984, 9.9 percent more than in 1983,
according to the annual survey conducted by BEA in late November and
December (table 1 and chart 10).1 The latest estimate for 1983 spending
is $303.2 billion, 4.2 percent less than in 1982, according to the
quarterly survey conducted a month earlier.2
1. The series consists of nonfarm expenditures for new plant and
equipment (P&E)--both for replacement and expansion--for use in the
United States, including most costs that are chargeable to fixed asset
accounts and for which depreciation or amortization accounts are
ordinarily maintained. The series excluded expenditures for land and
mineral rights; maintenance and repair; used plant and equipment,
including that purchased or acquired through mergers or acquisitions;
assets located in foreign countries; residential structures; and a few
other items.
The coverage of the series and the pattern of estimates differ from
those of the nonresidential fixed investment (NRFI) component of GNP.
The major differences in coverage are the inclusion in the GNP component
of investment by farmers, certain outlays charged as current expenses by
business, reimbursable expenditures for new motor vehicles purchased by
employees for business use, and certain transactions in used plant and
equipment. The pattern of estimates may differ due to timing because
the NRFI series reflects construction put in place and shipments of
equipment, whereas the P&E series reflects expenditures.
2. The 1983 estimate is based on actual expenditures in the first
three quarters and plans for the fourth quarter. The plans, collected
by BEA in October and November, were adjusted for systematic reporting
biases. The adjustments were made for each major industry group for
each quarter of the year by taking the median deviation between planned
and actual spending for that quarter in the preceding 8 years.
The 1984 plans were also adjusted for systematic reporting biases.
The adjustments were made for each major industry group when planned
spending deviated from actual spending in the same direction in at least
5 of the last 7 years. When this criterion was met, an adjustment was
made by taking the median deviation between planned and actual spending
for the preceding 5 years. Before adjustment, planned spending was
$127.94 billion in manufacturing and $203.79 billion in
nonmanufacturing.
The 1984 capital spending plans adjusted by BEA for price changes
indicate an increase in real spending of 9.4 percent (table 2). The
latest estimate of real spending for 1983 indicates a decline of 3.5
percent from 1982. The estimates of real spending are computed from
survey data on current-dollar spending and from capital goods price
deflators prepared by BEA. The deflators prepared for 1984 incorporate
survey respondents' price expectations. Specifically, the
current-dollar figures reported by survey respondents are adjusted using
implicit price deflators for each major industry group prepared by BEA
based on unpublished data in the national income and product accounts.
The industry deflators for 1984 are extrapolated based on a combination
of survey respondents' price expectations and the rates of change
in industry deflators during the latest four quarters for which such
data are available.3 The deflators indicate a 0.5-percent increase in
capital goods prices in 1984; the latest estimates indicate that capital
goods prices declined 0.7 percent in 1983. Survey respondents reported
a 5.1-percent price increase for 1983 and expect a 6.0-percent increase
in 1984 (table 3). Respondents have overestimated capital goods price
increases in 13 of the 14 annual surveys conducted since 1969.
3. Respondents were asked:
"What are your best estimates of average price changes from
1982 to 1983 and expected price changes from 1983 to 1984:
"a. Prices paid by your company for new construction,
machinery, and equipment.
"b. Prices of goods and/or services sold by your
company.'
The companies' responses on capital goods and sales price
changes were weighted by their reported capital expenditures and sales,
respectively.
If the spending plans are realized, 1984 capital spending would
turn out to be relatively strong for the second year of an economic
recovery (table 4). The 9.4-percent real increase would be almost 2
percentage points above the average real increase in the second full
year of recovery for the six previous post-1950 economic recoveries.
Relative to the previous economic recoveries, planned spending in
manufacturing is particularly strong, while that in nonmanufacturing--
with the exception of mining and public utilities--is slightly weaker.
Nevertheless, 1984 real capital spending in manufacturing would still be
below its peak-1981 level because of large declines of 9.1 percent and
5.6 percent in 1982 and 1983, respectively. Real capital spending in
nonmanufacturing --which declined 3.3 percent and 2.3 percent in 1982
and 1983, respectively --would be above its 1981 level, but still below
its peak-1979 level.
Industry plans
Manufacturing industries plan a current-dollar spending increase of
13.3 percent in 1984, compared with a 7.1-percent decline in 1983.
Durables industries plan a 16.4-percent increase and nondurables, a
10.7-percent increase. In durables, the largest increases are expected
in motor vehicles, 33.7 percent; electrical machinery, 24.1 percent; and
fabricated metals, 21.3 percent. In nondurables, the largest increases
are expected in rubber, 16.1 percent; "other nondurables,'
14.0 percent; petroleum, 12.8 percent; and paper, 11.7 percent.
Nonmanufacturing industries plan a current-dollar spending increase
of 8.0 percent in 1984, compared with a 2.4-percent decline in 1983.
The largest increase is expected in gas utilities, 20.2 percent.
Increases ranging between 14 1/2 and 9 percent are planned in railroads,
mining, "communication and other,' trade and services, and
"other transportation.' Electric utilities plan spending at
about the same level as last year, while a sizable 31.4-percent decline
is planned in air transportation.
Estimates of planned real spending in 1984 indicate a 13.0-percent
increase in manufacturing--15.9 percent in durable goods and 10.0
percent in nondurables. The latest estimates for 1983 indicate a
decline of 5.6 percent--7.8 percent in durables and 3.3 percent in
nondurables. A 7.4-percent increase in 1984 real spending is estimated
in nonmanufacturing, with increases in all major industry groups except
transportation. The latest estimate for 1983 indicates a decline of 2.3
percent.
Sales and sales prices
Manufacturers expect their sales to increase 11.5 percent in 1984
(table 5). Sales in 1983 increased 6.4 percent, compared with an
expected 10.3-percent increase. Trade firms expect an increase of 9.1
percent in 1984; they reported a 5.7-percent increase for 1983, compared
with an expected 7.1-percent increase. Public utilities expect an
8.4-percent increase in 1984 revenues; they reported a 2.4-percent
increase in 1983, compared with an expected 14.7-percent increase.
Manufacturers expect the prices of the goods and services they sell
to increase at a slightly higher rate in 1984 than in 1983 (table 6).
They expect prices to increase 4.7 percent in 1984, compared with a
3.1-percent increase in 1983; a year ago, they had expected a
5.0-percent increase. Public utilities expect a 7.6-percent increase in
1984; they reported a 9.3-percent increase in 1983, compared with an
expected 12.6-percent increase.
Table: Expenditures for New Plant and Equipment by U.S. Nonfarm
Business, 1981-84
Table: Real Expenditures for New Plant and Equipment by U.S.
Nonfarm Business, 1981-84
Table: Change in Prices of Capital Goods Purchased
Table: Real Plant and Equipment Expenditures During the Second Year
of Economic Recovery.
Table: CHART 10; Changes in Business Investment
Table: Percent Change in Business Sales
Table: Change in Prices of Products and Services Sold by
Manufacturing and Utility Companies