摘要:Orthodox economic models are good if one accepts the ceteris paribus . But this is possible if we accept that cultures are uniform, exogenous to the economic and the consumer has features such as equality of rational structure, among others. Similarly it is assumed mobility and economic geography optimizations when it comes to internal demographic flows and the migration as international movements, and generally any expression of human activity. Time is needed to take each event as "almost one-off", even though some aspects have similarities that prevent theoretically start from scratch in each analysis presented. What determines what is different? On the one hand, the historical basis assumed from the reasons of social construction of market, the reasons of social construction since ancient thought and the reasons for government social construction. Furthermore, the decisions, from the historical basis, are made by agents and contributions of the agencies, at their level, degree and intensity, to iterate it consolidate or change the social interactions and / or institutions established as and in accordance with rules, routines and habits. This is why it is interesting to develop the "neighborhood effects" to help understand the social mobility of the Department of Cundinamarca. This in order to contribute to resolving the question about why the mobility of people and what effect between territoriality and another and to itself?.
关键词:Territoriality;reasons of social construction of market; the reasons of social construction since ancient thought;reasons for government social construction; human mobility.;Territorialidad;razones de construcción social de mercado;las razones de construcción social desde el pensamiento antiguo;razones de construcción social gubernamental;movilidad humana.