文章基本信息

标题：Running Head: Only Game in Town Fallacy: the Only Game in Town Fallacy and Alternative Explanations for Experimental Findings
本地全文：下载
作者：David Trafimow
期刊名称：AMERICAN RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
电子版ISSN：2378-7031
出版年度：2015
卷号：1
期号：1
页码：3
语种：English
出版社：AMERICAN RESEARCH JOURNAL
摘要：People commit the “only game in town fallacy” when they insist that the lack of accessible alternative explanations forces acceptance of whatever hypothesis is on the table. This fallacy is familiar to philosophers because it often comes up in the context of arguments about the existence of God. However researchers in psychology often commit the fallacy too. Is it acceptable to commit the fallacy in the context of psychology hypotheses even if it is not in the context of God? I provide several possible answers to this question, and also discuss an augmented version of the fallacy.