文章基本信息

标题：ارزیابی ریسک ارگونومیکی ناشی از استرس پوسچرال به روش REBA
其他标题：Ergonomic risk assessment by REBA method
本地全文：下载
作者：E. Habibi ; S. Poorabdian ; P. Ahmadinejad 等
期刊名称：Iran Occupational Health
印刷版ISSN：1735-5133
电子版ISSN：2228-7493
出版年度：2007
卷号：4
期号：3
页码：35-43
语种：Persian
出版社：Tehran University of Medical Sciences
摘要：
چکیده
其他摘要：Background and aims Awkward posture has been recognized as one of the important risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD). The current study aimed at determining ergonomic risk level, WMSDs ratio and exploring working postures contribution to WMSD. During the study, working postures were phased and then they were scored using the REBAtool from observing the work. Methods To perform the study, workers of a home appliances manufacturing factory were assessed. In order to collecting required data, each part of the body was scored and work frequency, load/force, coupling were considered to achieve a REBA score. Nordic Questionnaire was used to determining WMSD ratio and its relationship whit REBA score. 231 working phases were assessed and 13761 questions using Nordic Questionnaire were answered. Percentage of the workers in press, spot welding, grinding, cutting, assembling, and painting was 15.8, 21.6, 25.9, 34.5, 89.9%, respectively. Workers were 18-54 years old and their work recording average was 52 month. Results REBAscore was 4-13 in under study tasks. REBA score = 9 had the most frequency (20%) and REBA score =13 had the least frequency (1.4%). Risk level in press, cutting, and painting was high (25.5, 100, 68.2%) cases). This shows that cutting has the highest risk level. On the other hand 38.5% of the workers in past 12 month had problem in different parts of their body. Totally 11.7% of the workers had problem in neck, 19.4$ in leg, 10.7% in foot, 82.5% in lower back, 87.6% in upper back and 7.8% in shoulders.10.7% of the workers had previous illness that 8.7% of them were non occupational and 1.9% were caused their previous jobs. The REBAscore mean and ergonomic risk level is not equal in tasks (p-value 0). Action level was necessary soon in others. Conclusion Risk level should be reduced specially in cutting. The heavy workload and working height poor design, awkward posture such as twisting with bending and sometimes carrying objects, standing/sitting for a long time during working shifts are some of the ergonomic risk factors.
关键词：پوسچر; ربا;سطح ریسک ارگونومیکی
其他关键词：Ergonomic risk level; REBA; Posture