期刊名称：Communications of the Association for Information Systems
印刷版ISSN：1529-3181
出版年度：2016
卷号：38
期号：1
页码：12
出版社：Association for Information Systems
摘要：Peer reviewing is critical in the process of legitimizing new scientific knowledge. Yet, concerns about its quality exist, especially if one considers developmental reviewing as an ideal. In this essay, I suggest three ways to improve review quality: provide reviewers with systematic feedback about their performance, reward active and good reviewers, and make reviewers more accountable by revealing their identities to the authors in certain conditions.
Loading...
