文章基本信息

标题：The Views of Graduate Students about Academic Mentoring
本地全文：下载
作者：Munise SEÇKİN, Ahmet AYPAY, Çiğdem APAYDIN
期刊名称：Journal of Higher Education and Science
印刷版ISSN：2146-5959
电子版ISSN：2146-5967
出版年度：2014
期号：1044
页码：28-35
出版社：Buluş Design and Printing
摘要：The purpose of this study is to investigate the views of the graduate students about academic mentoring. The study has been conducted with 184 graduate students studying at Hacettepe University, Ankara University, Anadolu University, and Eskisehir Osmangazi University. The views of the graduate students have been collected using ‘Ideal Mentoring Scale’ developed by Rose (2003). In order to check the validity and reliability of the scale, explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis have been performed. As the results of the analysis, the following dimensions were obtained; advising, honesty, relationship, relaxed personality, student recognition and time allocation. Frequency, percentage, arithmetic mean, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis. Scheffe test has been applied to the results that were found to be statistically significant after one-way ANOVA. Based on the findings of the study, the views of the graduate students about academic mentoring did not differ in terms of gender, education level, university and the academic title of the mentor. However, a difference was found on the sub-dimensions of ‘Ideal Mentoring Scale’. Based on gender, the views of the students did not differ in all sub-dimensions except relaxed personality. Mentor having a relaxed personality is more important for female students. The views of the students according to their education levels differed in terms of student recognition and time allocation. Their views about academic mentoring according to the titles of the mentors differed in terms of honesty. Significant differences were found among the views of the students whose mentor’s title is professor and the ones whose mentor’s title is associate professor. Also there was a significant difference between the views of the students whose mentor’s title is associate professor and whose mentor’s title is assistant professor.