首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月12日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Audit Structure, Time Pressure and Judgment Accuracy: A Comparison between Strategic System Audit and Traditional Audit
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Murad Abuaddous ; Mustafa Hanefah ; Nur Hidayah Laili
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Economics and Finance
  • 印刷版ISSN:1916-971X
  • 电子版ISSN:1916-9728
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:7
  • 期号:8
  • 页码:53
  • DOI:10.5539/ijef.v7n8p53
  • 出版社:Canadian Center of Science and Education
  • 摘要:

    The development of audit practice is a continuous process. The strategic system audit (SSA) method is a quite recent audit procedure that represents a complete shift from old audit techniques as it relies on assessing the client’s business risk using a top-down rather than a bottom-up (traditional) approach. Previous studies focused on the effectiveness of SSA in performing audit. In addition, previous studies did not rule out the role of auditors’ experience in an experimental procedure that compares between the two methods. Moreover, the effect of time pressure on auditors’ “JDM” effectiveness under Traditional Audit (TA) and SSA during the orientation phase is still lacking in the literature. Using expert auditors as a benchmark and 81 master degree students, a2x2 factorial design experiment and a Mann-Whitney U test show that auditors under SSA method issue a more effective audit assessment than under TA in the absence or presence of time pressure.

国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有