文章基本信息

标题：The Characteristics of Inner Speech of a Personality by Use of the Method of Dialogical Analysis of the Case
本地全文：下载
作者：Eduard Ivashkevych ; Ruslan Simko
期刊名称：Проблеми сучасної психології
印刷版ISSN：2227-6246
电子版ISSN：2663-6956
出版年度：2022
期号：57
页码：32-50
DOI：10.32626/2227-6246.2022-57.32-50
语种：English
出版社：Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, G.S.Kostiuk Institute of Psychology
摘要：The purpose of our article is to characterize the method of dialogical analysis of the case for description of inner speech of the person, to show it use on practice during the providing of statement experiment. Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also in our research we used a statement experiment as an empirical method. With the aim to diagnose the level of the development of inner speech of the person we used the author’s method of dialogical analysis of the case. The results of the research. In the article it was shown, that human feelings act as an experience of “Me”, and in this regard it is as external monologues, and on the other hand they are dialogical in nature, they can hear a broken dialogue with others: appeals, questions, expected answers, desires that are not expressed, accusations, etc., that exists in a covert form of internal dialogue. Under the dialogical analysis of the case we understand the reconstruction of the movement of internal dialogue, which becomes possible as a result of a special attitude to the text (for this purpose, special methods of textual analysis were developed). Conclusions. The inner speech was showed to be the speech for himself/ herself. External speech is speech for others. Psychologically, the language of the pupil in functional and structural terms is egocentric speech, it is not understood as internal speech and is not separated by the child from speech for others. Objectively, this language is a function differentiated from social thinking, but again inconsistent, because it can only function in a situation that makes social speech possible.