文章基本信息

标题：Law Enforcement in Handling Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Crimes Committed by Advocates Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 684 K/Pid.Sus/2009
本地全文：下载
作者：Rama Paramaswara ; Eva Achjani Zulfa ; Surya Nita 等
期刊名称：International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
电子版ISSN：2364-5369
出版年度：2022
卷号：9
期号：4
页码：391-399
DOI：10.18415/ijmmu.v9i4.3768
语种：English
出版社：International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding
摘要：This study aims to examine law enforcement's response to obstruction of justice and corruption offences committed by advocates using case studies from the Supreme Court Verdict No. 684 K/Pid.Sus/2009. The study's formulation of the problem is based on the Supreme Court Decision 684 K / Pid.Sus / 2009, and the Position of the Right to Immunity Advocates in Cases of Corruption. This is a normative juridical form of research. The results revealed that while the Position of Advocate possesses protection from prosecution in cases of corruption, this does not mean they are immune from the law. Equal protection under the law requires that equality before the law be respected and maintained as a common standard in law enforcement. Criminal liability for those who obstruct justice in corruption cases is 3 (three) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 150.000.000, if the defendant's activities are found to meet the elements of criminal acts as defined in Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 20 of 2001. It can be speculated that the concept of equality before the law must continue to be implemented because it signifies equality against everyone, whether privileged or impoverished, authorities or regular citizens. In a matter of fact, advocates do not receive legal immunity. In this instance, the advocate should also maintain the Criminal Justice System's, such as a precaution or even obstruct the legal process by not taking steps.
关键词：Obstruction of Justice;Corruption Crime;Advocate;Supreme Court Decision