文章基本信息

标题：Application of LCA by Using Midpoint and Endpoint Interpretations for Urban Solid Waste Management
本地全文：下载
作者：Sora Yi 1,2* , Kiyo H. Kurisu 3 , Keisuke Hanaki
期刊名称：Journal of Environmental Protection
印刷版ISSN：2152-2197
电子版ISSN：2152-2219
出版年度：2014
卷号：05
期号：12
页码：1091-1103
DOI：10.4236/jep.2014.512107
语种：English
出版社：Scientific Research Publishing
摘要：Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most widely used methods of decision support. However, few studies have examined whether stakeholders prefer midpoint or endpoint approaches. In this regard, the present study examines the attitudes toward urban solid waste management, environmental issues, and scenario evaluations by using midpoint and endpoint interpretations of LCA results. This study introduces three types of social groups that typically respond to environmental conflicts: the individualist, hierarchist, and egalitarian groups. Although residents are likely to recognize global impacts as the most important issue, their view is likely to change depending on system and avoided emissions. Consistent with the Seoul Metropolitan Area’s new policy designed to increase the incineration ratio, almost half of all respondents preferred the scenario. Noteworthy is that the respondents’ preference for midpoint and endpoint decision-making tools is not consistent with that in previous studies. Most of the respondents indicated that the midpoint approach would be better in evaluating environmental systems.
关键词：LCIA; Environmental Impact; Environmental Damage; Cultural Theory; LIME; Social Preference; NIMBY