文章基本信息

标题：Tropical cyclone track and intensity prediction skill of GFS model over NIO during 2019 & 2020
本地全文：下载
作者：Ch. Sridevi ; D.R. Pattanaik ; A.K. Das 等
期刊名称：Tropical Cyclone Research and Review
印刷版ISSN：2225-6032
出版年度：2022
卷号：11
期号：1
页码：36-49
DOI：10.1016/j.tcrr.2022.04.002
语种：English
出版社：Elsevier BV
摘要：AbstractThe Tropical Cyclone (TC) track prediction using different NWP models and its verification is the critical task to provide prior knowledge about the model errors, which is beneficial for giving the model guidance-based real-time cyclone warning advisories. This study has attempted to verify the Global Forecast System (GFS) model forecasted tropical cyclone track and intensity over the North Indian Ocean (NIO) for the years 2019 and 2020. GFS is one of the operational models in the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which provides the medium-range weather forecast up to 10 days. The forecasted tracks from the GFS forecast are obtained using a vortex tracker developed by Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). A total of 13 tropical cyclones formed over the North Indian Ocean, eight during 2019 and five in 2020 have been considered in this study. The accuracy of the model predicted tracks and intensity is verified for five days forecasts (120 h) at 6-h intervals; the track errors are verified in terms of Direct Position Error (DPE), Along Track Error (ATE) and Cross-Track Error (CTE). The annual mean DPE over NIO during 2019 (51–331 km) is lower than 2020 (82–359 km), and the DPE is less than 150 km up to 66 h during 2019 and 48 h during 2020. The positive ATE (76–332 km) indicates the predicted track movement is faster than the observed track during both years. The positive CTE values for most forecast lead times suggest that the predicted track is towards the right side of the observed track during both years. The cyclone Intensity forecast for the maximum sustained wind speed (MaxWS) and central mean sea level pressure (MSLP) are verified in terms of mean error (ME) and root mean square error (RMSE). The errors are lead time independent. However, most of the time model under-predicted the cyclone intensity during both years. Finally, there is a significant variance in track and intensity errors from the cyclone to cyclone and Bay of Bengal basin to the Arabian Sea basin.
关键词：KeywordsenTropical cycloneTrack predictionGFSNWPGlobal modelGFDL