首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Nature of Global Green Finance Standards—Evolution, Differences, and Three Models
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Christoph Nedopil ; Truzaar Dordi ; Olaf Weber
  • 期刊名称:Sustainability
  • 印刷版ISSN:2071-1050
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:7
  • 页码:3723
  • DOI:10.3390/su13073723
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:MDPI, Open Access Journal
  • 摘要:(1) Background: Green finance standards have proliferated with much need for harmonization to accelerate global green financial flows. However, little is known on the nature of green finance standards that accelerates differentiation, rather than harmonization. Therefore, we embark to answer the question what the nature of green finance standards is and specifically how green finance standards have evolved in major economic systems driven by different actors and leading to differences and commonalities over time and environmental focus area. (2) Methods: To analyze the question, we build a model based on institutional and standards theory and apply text analysis and statistical methods to analyze 84 green finance standards issued from 1998 to 2020. (3) Results: we find clear evidence that green finance standards evolve depending on economic governance types (e.g., market-based, government-based and in weak institutional environments), environmental focus areas (e.g., pollution, climate, biodiversity) and depend on actors in government, intermediaries and developing financial institutions. We also show that this development has been dynamic over the last few decades. We further test and confirm three models of green finance standards: output-based, input-based and process standards that have evolved. With the findings, we aim to provide a better foundation for both research and policy in future green finance standard research, development and harmonization<b>.</b>
  • 关键词:green finance; standards; institutional theory; China; European Union; emerging economies
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有