首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of AR and physical experiential learning environment in supporting product innovation
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ying-Chieh Liu ; Su-Ju Lu ; Ching-Yu Kao
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Engineering Business Management
  • 印刷版ISSN:1847-9790
  • 电子版ISSN:1847-9790
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:11
  • DOI:10.1177/1847979019839578
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:InTech
  • 摘要:This article compares how virtual and physical learning aids enhance learners’ product innovation capability, that is, design experiences and domain knowledge. The virtual aid utilises augmented reality (AR) allowing learners to experience a range of animated mechanisms using smart devices. The legacy physical aid mechanisms were made using three-dimensional printers. We studied the effects of both manipulatives on learners’ understanding of mechanical movements, for example, rack and pinion, and Geneva mechanism. To investigate learning impact of each aid, we compared the experimental results derived from two learners groups (13 participants each). This study provides a case to support product innovation education under an experiential learning environment. The outcomes showed that both aids were useful in enhancing design experiences and domain knowledge. Pre-and-post attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction motivation of both aids was found to be similar. However, distinctive differences were observed in terms of divergent search for ideation, suggesting for further research in combining both aids. We also found that learners’ learning motivation is lower in AR-based aid.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有