文章基本信息

标题：Correlation Between Learning Methods – Understanding Degree for Optimization Techniques in Power Systems Courses
本地全文：下载
作者：Oana Pop ; Oana Pop ; Flavius Dan Surianu 等
期刊名称：Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
印刷版ISSN：1877-0428
出版年度：2015
卷号：191
页码：568-573
DOI：10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.630
语种：English
出版社：Elsevier
摘要：AbstractThe manner of teaching in the case of the technical field discipline has a number of features that require the use of an appropriate learning method during the courses. One of the reasons the students seem to quickly forget what they learned is the nature of the texts they read. The aim of this study is to analyse the correlation between the conceptual developments of learning methods and how the students react during the courses. It assumes that an inadequate mode of realization and presentation of learning methods can lead to a decrease of the understanding level and learning. The following learning methods will be used: What You Think You Know / What You Want To Know/ What You Think You Know/ What You Learned Method (PLEASE CHECK THIS) (K-W-L) and Mind Mapping method. These methods are applied in Optimization Techniques in the Power Systems course. The authors performed a structuring version of the course for the K-W-L method and two variants of conceptual maps. The study was performed on three groups of students and revealed that the poor quality of achievement and presentation of learning methods can lead to the decrease of the level of understanding and learning of students. The K-W-L method is not adaptable for any course. Conceptual maps remain the preferred option because students can retain a large part of the details. The authors recommend the use of conceptual maps. However, the teacher's experience in the realization of these maps is crucial.
关键词：learning methods;optimization techniques;mind mapping