摘要:The topic of recovery from acquired multilingual aphasia has been debated since the late 19 century. Almost all existing reports were based on speakers of Indo-European languages. While Pitres9 Law claims that recovery comes first and most completely in the language most used just before the injury, Ribot^ Law suggests that recovery comes first in a speaker mother tongue. Parallel recovery was found to be the most prevalent (61%), followed by differential (18%), successive and/or antagonistic (9%), blended (7%), and selective recovery (5%) (Paradis, 2004).