文章基本信息

标题：Are There Differences Between 1RM Loads Determined in Isolated Tests vs. In Three Different Sequences?
本地全文：下载
作者：João Paulo Costa de Carli ; João Paulo Costa de Carli ; Thiago Gomes Figueira 等
期刊名称：Journal of exercise physiology online
印刷版ISSN：1097-9751
出版年度：2016
卷号：19
期号：6
页码：104-110
语种：English
出版社：American Society of Exercise Physiologists
摘要：Carli JPC, Figueira TG, Magosso RF, Campanholi Neto J, Souza GS, Perez SEA, Baldissera V. Are There Differences Between 1RM Loads Determined In Isolated Tests vs. In Three Different Sequences? JEPonline 2016;19(6):104-110. This study determined if there are changes in 1RM load of 8 exercises performed as isolated tests or in three different orders of execution. The subjects consisted of 10 male volunteers (age, 23.1 ± 3.3 yrs; height, 180.0 ± 6.9 cm; body weight, 81.6 ± 13.1 kg; BMI, 25.1 ± 3.2 kg·m -2 ; body fat, 14.7 ± 5.2%) who had at least three months of resistance training experience. The tests were made on the following exercises: (a) bench press; (b) leg press; (c) triceps extension; (d) knee extension; (e) lat pull-down; (f) half squat; (g) biceps curls; and (h) leg curl. A one-way ANOVA (Sphericity Assumed) for repeated measures with 1RM loads in the four tests was used to determine the level of significance, and the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined for the four 1RM loads. The significance level was set at P<0.05). The findings indicate that there are no differences between these methods, and that a sequence with 8 exercises can be performed to determine 1RM loads.
关键词：Resistance exercises;1RM test;Exercise order