首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月05日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Metabolic Equivalents for Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients during a Graded Treadmill Walking Test
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Steve Meadows ; Steve Meadows ; Kate Woolf May
  • 期刊名称:Journal of exercise physiology online
  • 印刷版ISSN:1097-9751
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:16
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:60-69
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:American Society of Exercise Physiologists
  • 摘要:Meadows S, Woolf-May K, Kearney E. Metabolic Equivalents For Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients during a Graded Treadmill Walking Test. JEPonline 2013;16(2):60-69. The current compendium regarding resting metabolic equivalents (METs) is based on 1 MET, which is defined as an oxygen uptake (VO2) value of 3.5 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 to understand energy expenditure, aerobic capacity, and exercise intensity in cardiac populations. Yet, a field test has indicated it is not sufficiently accurate and may lend itself to implications that are potentially hazardous. The purpose of this study was to determine METs in post-MI males during a controlled graded treadmill walking test (GTWT) using a comparative controlled study design. Seventeen male post-myocardial infarction (MI) subjects (mean ± SD, 63.0 ± 8.5, range 48 to 77 yrs) and 17 healthy male controls (51.9 ± 7.7, range 41 to 66 yrs) participated as subjects in this study. All subjects performed a GTWT at speeds 2.0 to 4.4 m·hr -1 . Throughout the testing, the subjects’ VO2, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. Analysis comparing lines of regression showed that the METs were significantly higher (P<0.05) for post-MIs vs. the controls. METs differed significantly for post-MIs vs. current compendium METs (P<0.01), and controls vs. current compendium METs (P<0.01). Given that both post-MIs and controls showed significantly higher METs vs. the current compendium values during a GTWT, these findings bring into question the appropriateness of the standard use of the current METs in this context.
  • 关键词:Cardiac Rehabilitation;METs;Exercise Prescription
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有