首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月04日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Linear Zero-Knowledgde. A Note on Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Arguments
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ivan B. Damgård ; Ronald Cramer
  • 期刊名称:BRICS Report Series
  • 印刷版ISSN:0909-0878
  • 出版年度:1996
  • 卷号:3
  • 期号:7
  • 出版社:Aarhus University
  • 摘要:We present a zero-knowledge proof system [19] for any NP language L, which allows showing that x in L with error probability less than 2^−k using communication corresponding to O(|x|^c) + k bit commitments, where c is a constant depending only on L. The proof can be based on any bit commitment scheme with a particular set of properties. We suggest an efficient implementation based on factoring. We also present a 4-move perfect zero-knowledge interactive argument for any NP-language L. On input x in L, the communication complexity is O(|x|^c) max(k; l) bits, where l is the security parameter for the prover. Again, the protocol can be based on any bit commitment scheme with a particular set of properties. We suggest efficient implementations based on discrete logarithms or factoring. We present an application of our techniques to multiparty computations, allowing for example t committed oblivious transfers with error probability 2^−k to be done simultaneously using O(t+k) commitments. Results for general computations follow from this. As a function of the security parameters, our protocols have the smallest known asymptotic communication complexity among general proofs or arguments for NP. Moreover, the constants involved are small enough for the protocols to be practical in a realistic situation: both protocols are based on a Boolean formula Phi containing and- , or- and not-operators which verifies an NP-witness of membership in L. Let n be the number of times this formula reads an input variable. Then the communication complexity of the protocols when using our concrete commitment schemes can be more precisely stated as at most 4n + k + 1 commitments for the interactive proof and at most 5nl +5l bits for the argument (assuming k the number of commitments required for the proof is linear in n. Both protocols are also proofs of knowledge of an NP-witness of membership in the language involved.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有