期刊名称:Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
印刷版ISSN:0211-2337
电子版ISSN:1988-2564
出版年度:2014
卷号:31
期号:2
页码:441-459
DOI:10.5209/rev_ASHF.2014.v31.n2.47577
语种:Spanish
出版社:Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
摘要:The Marxist tradition, with very few exceptions, always claimed that Marx’s method was dialectical and even thought that his work inaugurated a new philosophical school called “dialectical materialism”. Currently, with some academic serenity, we must conclude that his method is not dialectical. In this article we present two texts of Marx that are crucial for this discussion. Both were used by the Marxist tradition to enthrone dialectics. However this was caused by a bad interpretation of both texts.
其他摘要:The Marxist tradition, with very few exceptions, always claimed that Marx’s method was dialectical and even thought that his work inaugurated a new philosophical school called “dialectical materialism”. Currently, with some academic serenity, we must conclude that his method is not dialectical. In this article we present two texts of Marx that are crucial for this discussion. Both were used by the Marxist tradition to enthrone dialectics. However this was caused by a bad interpretation of both texts.