文章基本信息

标题：Transparency in Transcribing: Making Visible Theoretical Bases Impacting Knowledge Construction from Open-Ended Interview Records
本地全文：下载
作者：Audra Skukauskaite
期刊名称：Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research
印刷版ISSN：1438-5627
出版年度：2012
卷号：13
期号：1
语种：English
出版社：Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research
摘要：This article presents a reflexive analysis of two transcripts of an open-ended interview and argues for transparency in transcribing processes and outcomes. By analyzing ways in which a researcher's theories become consequential in producing and using transcripts of an open-ended interview, this paper makes visible the importance of examining and presenting theoretical bases of transcribing decisions. While scholars across disciplines have argued that transcribing is a theoretically laden process (GREEN, FRANQUIZ & DIXON, 1997; KVALE & BRINKMAN, 2009), few have engaged in reflexive analyses of the data history to demonstrate the consequences particular theoretical and methodological approaches pose in producing knowledge claims and inciting dialogues across traditions. The article demonstrates how theory-method-claim relationships in transcribing influence research transparency and warrantability. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201146
其他摘要：This article presents a reflexive analysis of two transcripts of an open-ended interview and argues for transparency in transcribing processes and outcomes. By analyzing ways in which a researcher's theories become consequential in producing and using transcripts of an open-ended interview, this paper makes visible the importance of examining and presenting theoretical bases of transcribing decisions. While scholars across disciplines have argued that transcribing is a theoretically laden process (GREEN, FRANQUIZ & DIXON, 1997; KVALE & BRINKMAN, 2009), few have engaged in reflexive analyses of the data history to demonstrate the consequences particular theoretical and methodological approaches pose in producing knowledge claims and inciting dialogues across traditions. The article demonstrates how theory-method-claim relationships in transcribing influence research transparency and warrantability.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201146
关键词：transcribing;transparency;open-ended interviews;ethnography;theory-method relationships;discourse analysis;warranting claims;Transkription;Transparenz;offene Interviews;Ethnografie;Theorie-Methode-Relation;Diskursanalyse;Güte;transcribir;transparencia;entrevistas abiertas;etnografía;relaciones método-teoría;análisis del discurso;reclamos de confiabilidad
其他关键词：education; social sciences;transcribing; transparency; open-ended interviews; ethnography; theory-method relationships; discourse analysis; warranting claims