期刊名称:THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
印刷版ISSN:2171-679X
出版年度:2006
卷号:21
期号:2
页码:197-212
DOI:10.1387/theoria.538
语种:English
出版社:UPV/EHU - University of the Basque Country
摘要:I argue for the possibility of historicized philosophy of science, and then respond to three criticisms of view: 1) history of science provides too few case examples to be useful to philosophy, 2) philosophy based on history is prone to reflexive inconsistency and 3) history of science exhibits an incoherent flux of methods.
关键词:historicized philosophy of science, induction, reflexivity, flux, methodology, evidence, Joseph Pitt, Nicolas Rasmussen.