文章基本信息

标题：Identity Centrality and In-Group Superiority Differentially Predict Reactions to Historical Victimization and Harm Doing
本地全文：下载
作者：Rezarta Bilali
期刊名称：International Journal of Conflict and Violence
印刷版ISSN：1864-1385
出版年度：2012
卷号：6
期号：2
页码：321-337
语种：English
出版社：International Journal of Conflict and Violence
摘要：Two U.S. studies report a differential effect of identity centrality and in-group superiority on reactions to in-group victimization and in-group harm-doing. Study 1 (N = 80) found that higher identity centrality predicted less justification for freely-recalled in-group victim events, whereas higher in-group superiority predicted more justification for freely-recalled in-group harm-doing events. Study 2 (N = 105) reexamined these findings in specific contexts of historical victimization (Pearl Harbor) and harm-doing (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), finding that in-group superiority was a predictor of reactions to historical in-group harm-doing (justification, emotional reactions, importance of events), whereas centrality was a predictor of reactions to historical in-group victimization.
关键词：inter-group violence, victim, perpetrator, ingroup identification, identity centrality, ingroup superiority